Is Bushwick Inlet Park on Track at Last?

After a recent demolition, the city now has access to the land it needs to begin the remediation process for the 27-acre park that Greenpoint and Williamsburg residents were promised back in 2005. Local organizers were elated, but wondered: what took so long? 

By Jack Delaney | jdelaney@queensledger.com

The year is 2021, and former Mayor Bill DeBlasio is apologizing as he holds up a $75 million check, flanked by local leaders from Greenpoint and Williamsburg. “A promise was made to this community a long time ago for this park,” he says, pulling down his mask, “and the city of New York did not keep the promise.”

The promise referenced by DeBlasio was made back in 2005 by his predecessor, Michael Bloomberg, who included plans for the 27-acre Bushwick Inlet Park as part of a massive rezoning of the two neighborhoods that year that paved the way for the frenetic development currently reshaping the borough’s northern tip. The condos have come up, but the full stretch of green space — the announcement of which was already perceived as ‘a long time ago’ in 2021 — has yet to materialize.

Now, in 2025, real change seems to be afoot. The demolition of the enormous CitiStorage building on Kent Avenue wrapped last week, putting an end to a land struggle that had prevented the Parks Department from moving forward with construction. As with many other local sites, the grounds will still need to undergo a significant remediation process, but officials praised the progress nonetheless.

“This has been a long and drawn-out fight, but the Citi Storage facility is finally down, making way for our long promised Bushwick Inlet Park,” said Council Member Lincoln Restler. “Our community has waited for far too long to see this promised park space, and I’m thrilled that this milestone means we can finally realize the full potential of our waterfront.” 

Demolition began in summer 2024. Photo: a still from Stephen McFadden’s time-lapse.

The demolished CitiStorage building was one of two structures owned by the company that had posed problems for the park’s development. The other, a nearby warehouse, was damaged by a fire in 2015. Though it was earmarked for the park, CitiStorage attempted to sell the 7.5-acre property to private developers before the city swooped in to make a $160 million purchase. The promised park’s planners now have access to land spanning from the North 9th Street soccer field all the way across the Bushwick Inlet, leading community organizers to believe that the 2005 designs may be feasible at last. 

“The CitiStorage building sat on some of the most beautiful land in our district, and that land was held hostage for a decade since the fire, while the community fought for this outcome. The fact that the building has finally been torn down, and the park design process can move forward, represents a tremendous victory for the community,” said Assembly Member Emily Gallagher, celebrating the demolition. “This didn’t just happen — it is the result of decades of tenacious organizing from the Friends of Bushwick Inlet Park, past and present local representatives, and so many community members who came together to demand that the land be used for public good, not luxury condos that would drive up prices in our district.”

Greenpoint and Williamsburg continue to have among the lowest number of parks per capita in the city, leaders say, and that gap is becoming more urgent as thousands of new residents pour into freshly-unveiled apartment complexes. There’s a climate angle, too: “As New York City increasingly becomes hotter and more expensive,” Gallagher noted, “it is essential that we fight for parks as free spaces where our neighbors can gather, find shade, and build community.”

One of the main forces pushing for the 27-acre green space to be realized has been the organization Friends of Bushwick Inlet Park, which launched a campaign nearly two years ago called “Where’s Our Park?” to pressure the city into action. Its president, Katherine Conkling Thompson, said the sudden view of uninterrupted coastline afforded by the demolition was “astonishing,” and thanked her fellow organizers for their efforts.

January 2025, and the demo is complete! Photo: a still from McFadden’s time-lapse.

“Over 150 years ago, the birth of the fossil fuel industry began here,” Thompson said in a statement. “As we begin to remediate this land, restore the riparian shoreline, plant native species to create precious public open space for all people to share, we can acknowledge that this is not only an investment in the future of our beloved Brooklyn but a symbol of the victory of the people coming together to demand environmental justice and [for] the city to fulfill its rezoning promises.”

You can watch a time-lapse of the demolition here, courtesy of Stephen McFadden.

BK Hospital Celebrates Two ‘Milestone’ Heart Surgeries

The cardiac surgery team at NYU Langone Hospital — Brooklyn poses with hospital leadership following the successful completion of the hospital’s first Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) procedure. Photo courtesy of NYU Langone

By Jack Delaney | jdelaney@queensledger.com

NYU Langone Hospital — Brooklyn completed two open heart surgeries last week, marking a significant milestone for the borough’s healthcare system. Both patients were Brooklynites who received the procedures near home and have been recovering well, according to the surgeons.

Whereas several hospitals in Manhattan perform a particularly difficult type of heart surgery called coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the options in Brooklyn are scarce. Mount Sinai offers CABG at its Manhattan locations, for example, but not in Brooklyn; NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital in Park Slope is one of the few borough-based sites for the surgery. 

That scarcity exists for good reason: the surgery is incredibly complicated to pull off. “[CABG] involves working on tiny coronary arteries, or blood vessels, to bypass blockages in the heart,” said Mathew R. Williams, MD, chief of adult cardiac surgery and co-director of NYU Langone Heart. “It requires extreme precision as it involves creating new ‘plumbing’ by using a graft to form a new channel for blood to flow to the heart. Unlike other heart surgeries, CABG focuses on restoring blood flow to the heart by rerouting blood around clogged arteries.”

In America, heart disease has been the leading cause of death since 1950 and over 3,000 people undergo CABG annually. The procedure, also known by the name ‘open heart bypass surgery,’ can take anywhere from 3 to 6 hours to complete, and the average life expectancy for patients after receiving the treatment is around 18 years. In fact, over 80% of people who require CABG are still alive 5 years afterwards.

“It was exciting,” said Dr. Williams, when asked about the two recent procedures. “What made it even more rewarding was seeing the patients go home just three days after surgery, feeling well and knowing they now have an improved longevity.”

A spokesperson for NYU Langone Hospital — Brooklyn explained that the successful surgeries were a “coordinated effort” by NYU Langone Heart’s experienced cardiac surgeons, specialized cardiologists, and dedicated advanced practice providers and nursing staff. The hospital announced in December that it was expanding cardiac services, and has made great strides since then. On top of the two CABG surgeries, the center’s cardiologists have also successfully performed more than 40 advanced atrial fibrillation ablations, something hospital representatives said was not available in Brooklyn previously.

Telling ‘NYC-Scale’ Stories with the MTA’s Open Data

The Subway Stories team (from left: Jediah Katz, Marc Zitelli, Julia Han) and Lisa Mae Fiedler (far right), head of the MTA Open Data initiative. Photo: Jack Delaney

By Jack Delaney | jdelaney@queensledger.com

“What a wonderful group of nerds we’ve put together in one room!” 

It was true: on a dismally cold Thursday night, a sold-out crowd had come to the NYC Transit Museum to listen to panelists — led by Lisa Mae Fiedler, manager of the MTA Open Data program and the evening’s first speaker — talk about maps, graphs, and charts. 

But their passion was infectious, even for a layperson. A central motif of the night was how data visualizations and more personal modes of storytelling, such as interviews, can inform each other. Fiedler illustrated this point with a particularly timely case study: subway crime. 

“My dad is here with his girlfriend,” said Fiedler. “And if anyone here has family from out of town, I think you are very familiar with the conversation — how could you possibly ride transit? It’s so dangerous on the subway, all of this crime is happening!” Anecdotes often seem to support this conclusion, she noted, but the data tell another story. She gestured at a slide showing that in the past few years crimes have hovered around one per million riders, and are trending downwards. 

A Shift Within the MTA

The concept of ‘open data’ has roots in the 1940s, when Robert King Merton advocated for the free dissemination of scientific research. The phrase was formalized in 2007, riding a wave of crowdsourced software and calls for a more democratic internet. That ethic steadily seeped into conversations about government, and in 2021 Governor Kathy Hochul signed the MTA Open Data Act, requiring the agency to make its datasets publicly available. “New Yorkers should be informed about the work government does for them every day,” Hochul said at the time, “but we have to make it easier for them to get that information.” The bill also established the role of a data coordinator, a position Fiedler has held since 2022. 

The law’s lasting result was a website, intuitive to navigate and accessible by anyone. (“As a public agency, we want our data to be usable by more than just people who are extremely tech savvy,” explained Fiedler.) That portal now boasts over 150 datasets, ranging from hourly ridership at every subway station since 2020, to which stops have Wi-Fi, and even a catalog of the MTA’s permanent art collection dating back to 1980. Eventually, the team hopes to make the site itself open source, meaning that users can contribute code to beautify it.

The MTA, which was established in 1965, provides around 2.6 billion trips per year, encompassing an enormous number of commuters and correspondingly large batches of data. It’s technically an independent entity run by a 17-person board of governors, with members recommended by the governor, New York City’s mayor, and executives from counties in the exurbs. However, its datasets are kept on the state portal (data.ny.gov), rather than the city’s analogous site (opendata.cityofnewyork.us).

When it’s not preparing data, Fiedler’s team does outreach: collaborations with media outlets such as the New York Times, blog posts, and public events like the Transit Museum talk. Another initiative is the MTA Open Data Challenge, a competition that incites citizen data enthusiasts to create projects based on the MTA’s data. The winning entry for the inaugural installment last fall was “Art off the Rails” by Stephanie Dang, an interactive map that allows New Yorkers to explore which stations have art installations.

Sonder, Storytelling, and the City’s ‘Splendor’

The event’s next presenters — Jediah Katz, Marc Zitelli, and Julia Han — were finalists in the competition, who had created an interactive map of their own called “Subway Stories.” Judges voted the project the ‘most creative storytelling,’ and it was boosted by Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine.

Echoing Fiedler, Katz argued that some stories about New York are too wide-ranging to be told without data. “As tempting as it is to take our own personal experiences and apply them to this city of 8 million people,” he said, “we need to resist the urge to do that.” But a tension exists, Katz conceded, because individual accounts often resonate in a way that statistics can’t. “While data is really powerful for uncovering the truth of what’s happening,” he concluded, “narrative is much more powerful for actually convincing the public.”

Katz and his co-designers envisioned “Subway Stories” (subwaystories.nyc) as a marriage of the two modes. Their map tracks five separate narratives, exploring questions such as why many Chinese-Americans take early-morning trips from South Brooklyn to Manhattan’s Chinatown, and what the heavy evening traffic on the L train says about the city’s current most popular neighborhoods for nightlife. In each case, the trio said, the starting point was some aspect of the MTA’s ridership data, which they then illuminated with an interview.

For the Chinatown story, for example, Anna Lee of Bensonhurst emphasized that many people in her community travel to Chinatown to play volleyball or basketball, work in boba shops, or call on elderly relatives. The conversation revealed a hidden angle to the data: it would be rude, Lee said, to ask older family members to travel all the way to Brooklyn, which is partly why the northbound F train spikes when it does.

The designers also solicited bite-sized anecdotes, along the lines of the NYT’s Metropolitan Diary or the Subway Creatures account on Instagram. “When reading these glimpses into [people’s lives],” Han said, “we couldn’t help but feel a profound sense of sonder,” a term for the “the realization that each random passerby is living a life as vivid and complex as your own.” She turned to the crowd, and asked if anyone wanted to share their own impromptu subway story. One man raised his hand — he had once spotted a high school acquaintance on the train, and texted them to ask where they were living now. They got out at his stop, and it turned out that their brother had been working in his office building, at his same company, for months: “Small world!”

During the Q&A, audience members were curious about how data collection could respect privacy, how long the project took to make, and (inevitably) the latest on congestion pricing.  For Katz, the central lesson was about storytelling. “If there’s anything I want you to take away from tonight,” he said, “it’s that data is so powerful because it’s the only way to measure New York City in its massive and chaotic splendor. But divorced from context, it can just become another sea of meaningless numbers. Only by tying data back to its source, by making it feel relevant to people’s everyday experience, can we ever hope to convince anyone of what we have to say.”

And as the event wound down, there was a shared excitement about new tools that could be crafted using the portal. “I hope that after tonight’s talk you’ll feel inspired, if you haven’t been already, to check out MTA Open Data,” said Fiedler, closing things out. “Play around with one of our datasets, and build something cool.”

Fill the Form for Events, Advertisement or Business Listing