Mayoral Hopefuls Vow (Mostly) United Front Against Adams and Cuomo

… and 4 more takeaways from the first major forum of the year, held last week at Brooklyn Law School.

State Senator Zellnor Myrie. Photo courtesy of Brooklyn Law School

By Jack Delaney | jdelaney@queensledger.com

It’s shaping up to be a crowded mayoral race, and a forum in Brooklyn on Thursday gave candidates an early opportunity to set themselves apart from the pack.

Recent polling suggests that if the election happened today, voters would choose someone who hasn’t even joined the race, at least not officially: former Governor Andrew Cuomo. Per Politico, the embattled Cuomo — a pugilistic figure who has faced both sexual harassment allegations and questions over his failure to divulge the true scope of nursing home deaths during the pandemic — is supposedly weighing a February launch date for his campaign, and has been building his team behind the scenes. 

A poll from last October had Cuomo beating current Mayor Eric Adams handily in a head-to-head contest, and the latest survey was no different. Thirty two percent of respondents cited Cuomo as their top choice, versus 10% for ex-Comptroller Scott Stringer, 8% for current Comptroller Brad Lander, 7% for state Senator Jessica Ramos, 6% for Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani — and only 6% for Adams. 

But campaign ads have yet to start running, and most voters aren’t focused on the race. Analysts caution that polling this far in advance of an election is often simply a test of name recognition, which is borne out by the fact that Cuomo and Adams also drew the highest negative ratings of the pool. And since neither attended the NYC Democratic Mayoral Candidate Forum, it offered five of the lesser-known candidates a prime time slot to throw shade at the absentees while raising their own profiles.

The event, hosted by Brooklyn Law School, included Ramos, Lander, and Mamdani, along with state Senator Zellnor Myrie and former Bronx Assemblymember Michael Blake. The group agreed on many policy questions: they would each uphold the original timeline for climate goals, stop Adams from shifting retirees to a Medicare Advantage plan, and build tens of thousands of new housing units. Yet in subtle ways, the forum also revealed fault lines that may prove influential once the campaign starts in earnest. Here are a few takeaways:

 

Takeaway 1: An Olive Branch to Trump

 

The elephant in the room was the president-elect — all five candidates ribbed Adams relentlessly for flying to Mar-a-Lago, but were also circumspect about the need to establish a working dialogue with a figure who has long been anathema to most Democrats.

For Ramos, the closure of five hospitals in Queens in recent years demonstrated that the healthcare system was in ‘dire straits,’ and would probably need resources from the new Trump administration. 

“I’m known for being a fighter. I’m very loud, and I like to take names, right? But we also have to maintain a very professional relationship and know how to pick our battles,” she conceded. “The reality of the matter is that we depend on the federal government for a lot of funding when it comes to our infrastructure, including our transportation.”

Be that as it may, Ramos did lay out a bright line on sexual and reproductive health. “If [President Trump] tries to attack those things,” she told the audience, “you better believe I’m gonna fight.”

A packed crowd. Photo courtesy of Brooklyn Law School

The state senator’s comments track with a larger trend sweeping the nation: Democrats in nearly every state are cautiously scaling back their scorched-earth approach to Trump in the wake of his inauguration, instead emphasizing collaboration. In fact, Ramos’ statement was remarkably similar to that of Michigan’s governor, Gretchen Whitmer, who said, “I won’t go looking for fights. I won’t back down from them, either.”

Myrie, Lander, and Blake expressed variations on this theme. But one notable counterpoint was Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani, who initially broke ranks with his colleagues.

“We cannot allow ourselves to be held hostage by a federal administration,” he said. “We will have to find the funding within our city and our state, and I’m confident that we can as opposed to trying to curry favor [with Trump].”

Yet roughly ten minutes later, even Mamdani softened his opposition: “I would make it clear that New York values and laws are not up for negotiation. That doesn’t mean that I would reflexively say no to each and everything.”

 

Takeaway 2: Mamdani Means Business

 

Mamdani has been cast as the socialist candidate, the furthest left in a field with its fair share of progressives. Yet top members of the Democratic Socialist Party have criticized him for running as a ‘spoiler’ who might divert voters away from other leftists like Lander, Myrie, and Ramos, who are perceived as having broader appeal. These aren’t just murmurs of discontent, either: in October, Assemblymember Emily Gallagher said in a statement that Mamdani’s campaign was “unfair to [NYC-DSA’s] project as a whole and could be ruinous.”

At the forum, however, Mamdani made a point of stressing his caché with moderates, using very few buzzwords as he laid out a slate of policies that largely resembled those of his opponents. 

“Any candidate running for mayor,” he said in his opening remarks, “has to run with a platform that speaks to all 8.3 million people who call this city their home.”

Yet Mamdani did take a hard stance — aligning with NYC-DSA — on reforming the police department.

“I would treat the NYPD like every other city agency,” he said, explaining that he would place the department under civilian control, crack down on overtime, and reduce what he viewed as staffing bloat. “[It] does not need to have an 80-plus person communications department. I didn’t need to see a five minute video shot by drones of how the NYPD invaded Columbia University. We need one to two people to be able to share the basic facts.”

The bottom line is that Mamdani is hoping to be more than a spoiler, and his robust fundraising and social media presence may help. His campaign is almost neck-and-neck with Lander and Ramos in the polls, an early sign that other candidates may have to take his bid seriously as the race wears on. 

 

Takeaway 3: Rikers Isn’t Closing Anytime Soon

 

In November, a judge held the city in contempt for its handling of the Rikers Island jail complex, threatening to turn jurisdiction over to the federal government. New York is legally required to shutter the facility by 2027, but a plan to replace it with a distributed array of  borough-based jails has stalled. Just last week, the judge held a hearing on how a receivership might work, though the takeover is still up in the air.

So when moderators asked the candidates whether they would commit to closing Rikers on time, it was a question with newfound urgency. The response was the same across the board: yes, it would be shut down, but not by 2027 — and no one shared a specific plan for when and how they would accomplish a feat that has evaded city officials for over a decade.

State Senator Jessica Ramos. Photo courtesy of Brooklyn Law School

“I would love to uphold the deadline,” said Ramos. “The truth is, I don’t know if I can, because nothing has been done by this current administration for the past three years.” 

The rest of the mayoral hopefuls were of similar minds. “We are facing some real administrative obstacles,” Myrie added, “and we have to be honest about that. But I’d be doing everything possible to get it closed on as close to that timeline as possible.”

 

Takeaway 4: Alliances Are On the Table

 

As is tradition, each candidate claimed to be uniquely qualified for the job. A former Obama staffer and small business owner, Blake said he alone had the local, state, and federal experience required to negotiate with Trump; Lander asserted that he was the only candidate in the race who was not taking contributions from real estate developers, and touted his track record of fighting corruption. Yet despite this jockeying, there was a consensus that infighting would have to be set aside if it detracted from the larger goal of defeating Adams and Cuomo. 

New York’s 2021 elections used a new system, ranked-choice voting, which was employed again for the second time in the 2024 cycle. The name says it all: instead of choosing one candidate, voters can rank up to five options. If a candidate takes more than half of first-choice votes, they win outright. If not, the voting continues through several rounds to decide a winner. The system was proposed as a solution to low turnout, but it also opens the door for candidates to benefit from higher rankings through alliances. 

Although no assurances were made — ”I am still willing to be swayed by my fellow colleagues,” said Ramos, “so I don’t have an exact order yet” — most of the candidates at the NYC Democratic Mayoral Candidate Forum seemed open to a concerted ballot strategy if it would topple the incumbents. 

”We have to get this right, because if Maya Wiley and Catherine Garcia had cross-ranked and cross-endorsed each other [in 2021], one of them would be mayor right now,” said Lander. “And our mayor would not be flying to Mar-a-Lago.”

A Dust Cloud Blows in Brooklyn

Residents of the Columbia Waterfront District say a nearby cement operation is making their air purifiers go ‘berserk.’ The DOT claims it’s under control.

After the rally, Amanda Zinoman and fellow residents block a DOT vehicle from entering the cement recycling facility. Photo: Jack Delaney

By Jack Delaney | jdelaney@queensledger.com

What you need to know:

  • Columbia St residents are calling for the closure of a cement recycling facility run by the city, which they say is causing both noise and air pollution.
  • The DOT says that the recycling is critical to reducing emissions, and claims it has introduced safety measures. However, local leaders have posted footage that suggests these measures have not been implemented consistently.
  • City officials reiterated that the site will remain open during a meeting last week, but area pols said they would visit soon to ensure that dust mitigation efforts are occurring.

Read on:

I’m shivering as I peer down at the man in the beanie’s phone, which shows a dramatic scene —it’s a video seemingly taken by a drone around sunset, in which a roughly fifty-foot tall cloud of dust blows off a mound of concrete rubble by the docks and billows ominously inland, toward the homes of Red Hook — when the rally takes a turn.

The public statements are over, and a clump of elected officials hangs back to answer questions. But local resident Amanda Zinoman, wearing a neon orange beanie of her own, is leading a group of protesters to the gates of the cement recycling plant on Columbia Street. They’ve spotted two newcomers: a pair of Department of Transportation workers is pulling up to their site in a truck, and Zinoman’s cohort is determined to stop them.

“We need a real solution — no more air pollution!” the residents chant, standing shoulder to shoulder to block the entry. “Shut it down!” A TV cameraman swoops in; soon an NYPD car arrives on the scene, and two officers step out to appraise the situation. A small crowd of protesters, including a man in a luchador mask, a local named Luke, cheers from the sidelines. For their part, the DOT employees seem more mystified than miffed.

The energy swells, and then — in an instant — dissipates. The officers calmly usher the picketers aside, the truck rolls ahead, and soon most of the rallygoers head home.

Yet discussions with parents and tenants who lingered for hours in the 30-degree weather suggest that local opposition to the recycling facility, which opened approximately one year ago in what was originally billed as a temporary relocation, is unlikely to subside anytime soon. 

Local legend John Leyva, pictured above, was the rally’s MC. Photo: Jack Delaney

At issue is whether SIM Municipal Recycling, which was moved to the current site to make way for offshore wind infrastructure at the South Brooklyn Terminal, poses a significant pollution risk to those living nearby. 

In theory, concrete recycling is a step towards sustainability: cement production alone accounts for 8% of global emissions, and when a French firm unveiled the world’s first housing complex to be built with 100% recycled concrete in 2022, developers in the U.S. took note —  it seemed like a promising path to meeting lofty climate goals.

On the local level, however, the crushed concrete produced by recycling facilities is still crystalline silica, which can be hazardous to humans if inhaled. The DOT has previously said that the Columbia Street site uses safety measures — mainly keeping the dust wet with sprinklers — that prevent it from becoming airborne.

“Concrete recycling is an important part of NYC DOT’s safety and accessibility work, and this plant was relocated temporarily to accommodate the city’s critical, climate-saving offshore wind operations. We are taking all the necessary steps to keep the public safe—though in response to community feedback, NYC DOT has taken new measures to decrease the size of the recycled material piles in this plant and further reduce dust and noise.” 

But residents at the rally questioned whether these measures were being consistently implemented, and shared stories of how the facility was impacting their wellbeing.

“I’ve had grey dust in my home daily since February 2024,” said local Geraldine Pope. “I needed to install air purifiers in every room. I wake up in the morning with a dusty cough. I cannot open my windows anymore because the air is now toxic to me.”

Rob Petrone, a resident who lives directly across from the site, had similar complaints. “I can’t open my garbage pail or hold my stair rail without getting gray toxic dust on my hands, I can’t open my window without my air purifier going berserk,” he said, noting that no neighbors were given advance notice of the relocation. “So many of us have kids, and this is what they breathe daily as they walk to school, as they go to parks, as they play sports.” 

Corroborating their claims, a man quietly pointed to the roof of a nearby car, which was — sure enough — covered in the much-discussed dust. 

Zinoman was frustrated that the DOT was, in her view, refusing to recognize a reality that was clear to those on the ground. “Why are my lungs feeling so shit? I live right here — of course that’s it,” she said. “Look at his car! You can see it in the air, it’s not abstract.”

Like Petrone, resident Ivan Martinovic felt particular urgency as a parent. “We have a concrete plant three blocks away from our school,” he said, referencing PS 29. “Let that sink in. I don’t know if I would be here if I didn’t have a son, but I am here, and I’m inclined to speak. I’m here for his classmates. I’m here for the kids in next year’s incoming class, the future. The community deserves better.”

A truck eventually passes through, as residents continue to chant. Photo: Jack Delaney

Another sticking point is the noise pollution, which several protesters said begins around 6 a.m. and ‘shakes the foundations’ of their homes. In December, DOT Commissioner Ydanis Rodriguez said that noise minimizers had been installed on nearly all of the site’s vehicles and equipment, yet concerns remain.

Local electeds have been taking note. Following a rally last November, Council Member Shahana Hanif, Congresmember Dan Goldman, Assemblymember Jo Anne Simon, and state Senator Andrew Gounardes sent a joint letter demanding that the facility be shut down by the end of 2024. The DOT demurred, promising last year that it would suspend operations on days when winds exceed 30 mph, adopt further mitigation strategies and look for a new site. But “these commitments have not been fulfilled,” the letter alleged. “Dust emissions persist, and operations continue despite high winds.”

At the event on Wednesday, officials said that the DOT response had outlined a plan for more water trucks and other tools to keep the piles of recycled concrete aggregate, or RCA, wet and therefore contained. But like residents, they were skeptical that the measures were being enacted. “We’ve seen enough footage from when that letter was sent to us up until now,” said CM Hanif, “to know that that’s not true.”

The day after the rally, Hanif and her colleagues met with Rodriguez and Deputy Mayor of Operations Meera Joshi to demand the ‘immediate closure’ of the facility. The results were mixed: a spokesperson for Hanif’s office said that the duo declined, citing potential delays to other city projects. Instead, they shared progress on mitigation efforts, such as an irrigation system that Rodriguez had previously asserted would be rolled out in February.

Residents aren’t appeased. “Anytime there’s a dangerous situation, it gets shut down until you can figure everything out,” said John Leyva, as Zinoman stared down the DOT truck. “This can’t go on for another six months.” 

 

Fill the Form for Events, Advertisement or Business Listing